Skip to main content

Pre-web Technology, The Communal Table

Has anyone dined at a communal table? You know the scene. You're seated facing absolute strangers. This may sound awkward for some, engaging for others, or simply a matter of function and nothing to fuss about. Maybe, it really depends on how hungry you are. No matter which camp you find yourself in, it would make sense to lean on some pre-web technology skills. I mean, I’m sure you’re going to be as pleasant as possible while trying to enjoy a meal.

Harkening back to undergraduate linguistics, I recall the conversational maxims presented by Paul Grice in his highly regarded work, "Logic and Conversation". Applying this criterion for welcomed discourse at our hypothetical communal table (or no-tech social media platform), we succeed in breaking the ice, getting to learn about new people, and not being overwhelmed in the process (I really hope there’s some decent grub involved here). How does this relate to Web 2.0? Well, thanks for asking. We can also tie the maxims directly into social media as best practices for a community.

Conversational Maxims
Maxim of Quantity: Make your contribution as informative as required.
Maxim of Quality: Do not say what you believe to be false.
Maxim of Relation: Be relevant.
Maxim of Manner: Be brief, orderly, avoid ambiguity, and obscurity of expression.

Considering these maxims, prompted me to take another look at the multi-faceted honeycomb conceptual diagram offered up by Keitzman and company in "Social media? Get serious! Understanding the Functional Building Blocks of Social Media". I'm mostly drawn to the conversational facet and its implications on microblogging platforms, as Keitzman shows us that conversation is explicitly tied to ‘conversation velocity’: the rate and direction of change in a conversation. The rate of change is the number of new conversations over a specified period of time, and the direction of change is the continuity-discontinuity of the conversation.

I can’t help but think how Grice's conversational principles and Keitzman's conversational facet have implications for positive cooperative engagement and reinforcement of message continuity. Whether situated in a community based on a brand building loyalty among it's users or a community of practice working on mutual goals, digital exchanges that meet the Gricean criterion would establish value in the message.

References
Chapman, S. (2008). Paul Grice, philosopher and linguist. Besingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., Mccarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241-251. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.005

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lunch Bytes: 05

With all that we are gifted from the open resources community, how can we contribute and give back? Fortunately, Creative Commons has provided a tool that both serves the commons and is engaging enough for the end user to pony up. With this, the Web 2.0 Test Kitchen is taking a moment to praise CC and stock the commons with our own content. The List , is a Creative Commons developed application that allows users to snap some pics and directly upload. Under the GNU license, it’s a free program for all. You’ll just need a smartphone that meets the technical requirements. As soon as you install and open the app, you'll see the Creative Commons CC logotype. You're in! Once, the app opens you’ll be prompted as to the current needs of Creative Commons with a request for a specific type of subject matter. For example, “Creative Commons needs a picture of…”. You have the choice to accept, move to the next request, or hit "done". All items selected will fall un...
2 comments
Read more

Too Hot, Too Cold

Who could forget the children’s classic, Goldilocks and the Three Bears? Possibly imagined as a cautionary tale, the protagonist burglar inadvertently exposes the child reader to relativism and harmony. Each new encounter within the bear’s home is an exercise in finding balance. Keep this narrative in mind as we serve up some metaphorical bowls of porridge in our Web 2.0 Test Kitchen. When it comes to our interconnectedness, how much time and attention is just right? The answer is fairly simple, it's relative to the person. We each have our own threshold on sustained attention over a period of time. With regards to social networks, I can honestly say that I haven’t found that balance. I’m either in a prolonged state of connectivity or the esoteric hermit that barely peeks outside his mountaintop cave only to scurry back into obscurity. My work-related connectedness has been demanding and follows Ranie and Wellman’s (2012) assertion that “many workers experience some negative i...
1 comment
Read more

Fresh Ingredients, Old Cookbook

Sometimes, inspiration is not enough to knock out a home run dish. You need a strong foundation to build your improvisational skills in the Test Kitchen. A good start involves a nostalgic return to the classics. For me, the fundamentals in working with social media go back to the Charlene Li and Josh Bernoff chef-d'oeuvre, Groundswell: Winning In a World Transformed by Social Technologies. Their best practice, and a tried-and-true social media strategy called the POST method gives us a clear starting point for our campaigns. Here's the rundown: P - People:  We need to understand who our audience is in order to best engage them. O - Objective:  Clear and measurable objectives can help determine if we're successful or not. S - Strategy:  A winning strategy focuses on an effective transaction or value exchange between you and your audience. T - Technology:  Once we understand our people, objective, and strategy, we can then confidently adopt the necessary to...
2 comments
Read more